A cost-minimization analysis of large overjet reduction with two removable functional appliances based on a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess and relate the societal costs of reducing large overjet with a prefabricated functional appliance (PFA), or a slightly modified Andresen activator (AA), using a cost-minimization analysis (CMA). Design, settings, and participants: A multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted with patients from 12 general dental practices. Ninety-seven patients with an Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusion, and an overjet of ≥6 mm were randomly allocated by lottery to treatment with either a PFA or an AA. The PFA and AA groups consisted of 57 and 40 subjects, respectively. Blinding was not performed. Duration of treatment, number of scheduled/unscheduled appointments, and retreatment were registered. Direct and indirect costs were analysed with reference to intention-to-treat (ITT), successful (S), and unsuccessful (US) outcomes. Societal costs were described as the total of direct and indirect costs, not including retreatments. Interventions: Treatment with a PFA or an AA. Results: The direct and societal costs were significantly lower for the PFA than for the AA group. The number of visits was lower in the PFA group, when ITT was considered, and for the US cases as well. No difference in retreatment rate could be seen between the groups. Limitations: Costs depend on local factors and thus should not be generalized to other settings. Harms: No harms were detected during the study. Conclusion: The success rate of the both appliances was low. However, the PFA was the preferred approach for reduction of a large overjet in mixed dentition, since it minimized costs and there were no difference in clinical outcomes between PFA and AA. Registration: This trial was registered at 'FoU i Sverige' (http://www.fou.nu/is/sverige), registration number: 97131. Protocol: The protocol was not published before trial commencement.

Outcome of treatment of Class II malocclusion by intraoral mandibular distraction.

Our aim was to find out long-term results of treatment in patients treated orthodontically and by mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Data on duration of treatment, costs, and results of 26 patients (13 girls and 13 boys) with a mean age of 15 years were analysed. The preoperative cephalograms were compared with those taken at the last follow-up visit. There was a significant reduction in duration of treatment when patients were treated without a first phase that included functional appliances. The differences in costs of orthodontic treatment were not significant. The costs of the operation for distraction were significantly higher compared to BSSO, mainly because of the costs of the distraction devices. Comparison of the cephalograms showed a significant increase in SNB angle, Wits value, ANB angle, overjet, and overbite. The Y-axis, MP/S, and SpP/MP angle increased. Orthodontic treatment and distraction of the mandible was a successful, but more expensive, treatment.

[Class II malocclusion. Time and cost of a combined orthodontic and surgical treatment]. / Klasse II-malocclusie. Duur en kosten van een gecombineerde orthodontische en chirurgische behandeling.

During orthodontic treatment of 29 patients with a Class II malocclusion, the remaining overjet was corrected surgically by intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis. The patients were divided in two groups. Group A was treated orthodontically in a two-phase approach, using functional and fixed appliances. Group B was treated in a one-phase approach with only fixed appliances. Before treatment the differences in age, gender and severity of the malocclusion between the groups, were not statistically significant. After distraction-osteogenesis, all orthodontic treatments could be finished successfully. The mean treatment time was for group A 44.2 and for group B 28.6 months. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The mean orthodontic treatment time after distraction osteogenesis was 9.1 months. The mean cost for the orthodontic treatment was not statistically significant different between the groups.